Category Archives: Advice on how to Lose Weight

Why Weight Loss Is Rarely Permanent

Many years ago at a meeting that addressed the usefulness of prescribing appetite suppressants for weight loss, one of the speakers (whose name will not be mentioned in case my memory is incorrect) said,

Obesity is a chronic disease.  Don’t think that allowing a patient to use weight-loss drugs will produce a permanent weight loss, or that other weight-loss intervention will also stop future weight gain. Obesity, like depression, alcoholism or autoimmune diseases, is chronic, and chronic diseases may go into remission because of medication and/or effective behavioral changes….So while sometimes one treatment is sufficient, the depression or skin rash never reappears after the initial intervention. The alcoholic stays abstinent.  Rarely is it that the diet plan or diet drug or surgery produces a permanent, positive change and weight stays normal. More commonly? The disorder reappears, more than once, and requires repeated behavioral, and/or medical interventions. Indeed, chronic treatment may be the only way to prevent flare-ups, a return of drinking, or depression.”

He went on to say that there is a bias toward people who gain weight again and again. We all know this…From the cruel remarks we make when someone is on a diet (Another one? Not again!) or gaining back the weight lost from the previous one (See, I knew she would never keep the weight off! ) to the hopeless attitude of physicians who give up helping a patient deal with constant diet failures (There’s no point wasting time talking about losing weight; he/she never listens.)

Weight-loss advice ranges from suggesting the most ridiculous or severe diets, to the simplistic mantra of portion control and exercise. Or else we keep quiet and shake our heads. “See,” we say to each other, “she has gained back all the weight she lost last year.“ And then we judge the currently popular diet with the comment, “Too bad this didn’t work, either.”

Yet so many of us have friends, colleagues, relatives, and acquaintances who have been abstinent and suddenly are found drinking again, perhaps after years of not doing so. When they are able to resume their AA meetings or come out of rehab, we don’t berate them with, “You failed. What is the point of helping when you will fail again? “ Rather, we support their effects to succeed.

If we treat obesity as a disease with a high probability of reoccurrence, as is the case with depression or alcoholism, then our entire approach to treatment can differ. All interventions will be presented honestly as a means of bringing the patient into remission, which may last weeks, months, or years. Still, the interventions will not be presented as a permanent cure. Taking out a diseased appendix is a permanent cure for a diseased appendix. Staying abstinent, if not a cure for alcoholism, is remission one day at a time.  Losing weight is not a permanent cure for obesity. Rather, it is remission from overeating and underexercising, one day at a time.

Treating obesity as a chronic disease allows a variety of interventions to be tried without blaming the patient if he or she fails to succeed at one or the other. Depressed patients are often switched from drug to drug, and the patient is not blamed when the depression doesn’t respond to a particular medication. Just as talk therapy is considered as important as drug treatment for depression and related mental illness, so too talk therapy should be part of the obesity treatment. Recognising what might erode control over eating is essential for success on a current diet, but also in delaying the onset of another weight gain flare-up. Semi-annual check-ups of weight status must be mandatory so the patient and care provider can identify emotional, situational, or even hormonal changes that might start the weight gain process. Such check-ups should remove the inevitability of weight gain in the minds of the patients.

For example, people who suffer from winter depression resign themselves to gaining weight over the dark months of late fall and winter, since weight gain is one of the symptoms of this particular type of depression. People also assume and anticipate gaining weight over the holidays. But why should this be? Would we assume that a friend, a recovering alcoholic, would start drinking over the winter, or that someone who is depressed every winter not be treated because the depression will come back the next year? If a patient had an intolerable flare-up of psoriasis, which can be maddeningly itchy, then every winter wouldn’t a dermatologist take steps to prevent it from occurring?

Because we don’t view obesity as a chronic disease, we simply do not treat it when we should. We don’t say to someone gaining weight, “You are experiencing a weight gain flare-up. It is important for you to be treated now before the situation becomes intolerable or hard to reverse.” A patient who has reoccurring depression should obviously be treated long before the symptoms become life-threatening. When the weight gain flare-ups occur, treatments also should be initiated. They include appetite suppressants, therapy, consultation with a physical therapist about exercise, use of calorie-controlled meals until control over eating is resumed, and participation in weight-loss support groups.

Of course, none of this will work if the weight-gaining patient refuses to acknowledge what is happening and/or resists treatment. Not all alcoholics who have failed to remain abstinent acknowledge what is happening or seek treatment; when they do, many are able to go back into remission. We must tell the obese individual to stop hoping for permanent weight loss. Keep the weight off today, and we will be there to help you if tomorrow is a problem.

If I Don’t Pay Attention to What I am Eating, Will the Food Contain Calories?

“What do you usually eat on a typical day when you are not dieting?”

I often ask this question when meeting a weight-loss client for the first time. Although I write down the information, I know that it is rarely complete. It is very hard for any of us to recall everything we have eaten yesterday or a few days ago, especially food that is not consumed as part of a meal. Did we munch on the potato chips that came with the lunchtime sandwich? Did we pop a few nuts in our mouths when we saw the bowl on the coffee table? Did we taste the food we are making for dinner and perhaps do more than just taste? Did we or didn’t we have a glass of wine with dinner, or was it two?

As hard as it is to remember what we ate it is even harder to remember how much. Few of us visually measure the size of the entrée put in front of us in a restaurant, or notice the quantity of food we eat at home. Was the chicken 4 ounces or 6? Was the rice a half a cup or two cups? How big was that piece of blueberry pie? And sometimes our best intentions to eat only a small part of what is put in front of us get lost when our attention is directed elsewhere while we are eating. I remember seeing a couple aghast at the size of their meals when it was put down in front of them in a restaurant known for their supersized portions. But they consumed everything on their plates because their attention was diverted to an intense discussion they began as they started to eat. The faster they talked, the faster they ate, and I suspect they never noticed how much they were eating until their plates were empty.

Reading emails on one’s smartphone, watching a video on a laptop device, or texting with the non-fork containing hand also interferes knowing how much is being eaten. When attention is elsewhere, the act of eating becomes automatic. The fork moves from plate to mouth to plate again, and the eater may not notice how much is being eaten until the plate is empty. If an hour later the eater was asked what and how much was eaten, he or she might be able to give only vague details. Indeed, sometimes the eater denies that much was eaten at all. “I just tasted the food and left most of it,” he will claim when the reality is that there was nothing left on the plate when he finished the meal.
Unless we must keep track of our food intake for health and weight-loss reasons (for example, a diabetic keeping track of grams of carbohydrate), we usually give only perfunctory attention to what we are eating. But even if we forgot what we put in our mouths, our metabolism does not. A calorie we do not notice eating still counts as a calorie we have eaten.

This absent-minded eating can make it very hard to lose weight. The heavily advertised weight-loss programs that restrict all food intakes to packaged drinks, snacks, and meals delivered to your door make paying attention unnecessary because the meal choices are programmed to enable weight loss. But if you are on a weight-loss program that gives you choice of what, and to some extent, how much you are eating, then often the only way to keep track of what you are eating is “to keep track.” There are apps for this, along with the traditional paper and pen food diary. Some people are able to keep track of everything they eat (they also balance their checkbooks), sometimes for months, and they are usually successful in losing weight and keeping it off. But for the rest of humanity for whom even keeping track of today’s date is difficult, recording everything that is eaten becomes very tedious very fast.

People who have maintained an appropriate weight for many years often follow an unchanging menu for breakfast and lunch. They don’t have to pay attention to what they are eating because their meal choices never vary. They often have rules about what they will eat for dinner as well: limited alcohol intake, salads with dressing on the side, eating only half the restaurant portion or sharing an entrée, avoiding fried foods and dishes with thick sauces or melted cheese, or avoiding all carbohydrates or all fats.

Weight-loss programs that do not make it necessary to pay attention to what and how much is eaten because all the foods are pre-measured rarely offer effective advice on how to pay attention to what is being eaten after the diet is over. The concept doesn’t sell very well in television advertisements for people who just want to lose the weight, but it is critically important to do so.

Making rules that limit food choices may be the most effective method, but may turn eating into more of a chore than delight. One thing that helps is spending 20 seconds to look at what is on the plate before eating. In those 20 seconds you can decide what you will eat in its entirety, what you will avoid and what you will eat sparingly. Taking a picture with a cell phone so the calories can be figured out later is also useful. It also may give you an idea of whether you have eaten anything healthy that day. Mindless snacking is a caloric hazard. Dipping one’s hand into a bowl or bag of snacks like nuts, cookies, or chocolate almost always causes excess calories to be eaten without any memory of doing so.

Not paying attention to what you are eating has a price: you may not know but, alas, your clothes and scale will eventually know only too well.

Will the Bacteria in Sauerkraut Make You Thin?

Most of us pay less attention to the many colonies of bacteria living in our intestinal tract than we do to the possibility that there may be colonies living on Mars. Recent research suggests it is time to do so. Our gut contains densely packed colonies of bacteria that affect not only digestion and diseases of the intestinal tract, but also our immune system and, according to some research, perhaps hunger, weight, mood, and athletic performance as well.

According to an article by Drs. Zhang and Yang, our intestinal tract contains more than 1000 or more bacterial species. These varieties of bacteria, of which we are usually unaware unless we have “tummy troubles,” function to assist in digestion,  particularly of high fiber fruits and vegetables. They break down the chemical composition of fiber, thus transforming the indigestible carbohydrate to substances, as well as short chain fatty acids, which are used for energy. Our bacteria are also gatekeepers, helping the intestinal immune system deal with foreign antigens or proteins when they enter our body. Intestinal bacteria contain enzymes that make vitamin K, a critical component in the formation of blood clots. Intestinal bacteria also synthesize other vitamins: biotin, vitamin B12, folic acid, and thiamine.

That the bacterial flora can change is well known to anyone who has taken antibiotics for several days, and then confronted with less than optimal intestinal functioning. The antibiotic wipes out so-called healthy bacteria, and sometimes it takes several days or longer to restore normal functioning.

Zhang and Yang’s report asserts that diet also causes significant changes in gut bacteria. Consumption of a high-fat, high-sugar diet causes unhealthy bacteria to flourish. Conversely, diets low in those nutrients, but high in fiber, bring back a better class of bacteria. For somewhat obvious reasons, most of these studies are done on laboratory animals, since they require samples of intestinal bacteria found in the feces, and it is hard to find human volunteers for these studies.

Is it possible that our bacteria can affect our mood? Some scientists suggest that we can reduce anxiety and depression if we have the good kind of bacteria. This is based on evidence that intestinal bacteria make neurotransmitters, the chemicals that transmit messages in the brain. But it seems unlikely that our gut will control our mood since neurotransmitters made in the gut never get into the brain. (But interestingly, we do talk about our gut having feelings, i.e., our language is full of expressions that suggest our gut has moods: a feeling in my gut, gut response, gut reaction, etc…)

Intestinal microbes may affect the amount of ghrelin, a hormone that tells the brain whether we are hungry. But if so, no one has figured out what species of intestinal bacteria may do this—or whether they will make us feel so full we will eat less. Now athletes are allowing their intestinal bacteria to be analyzed to see if they differ from those of sedentary folk. According to an article in a recent issue of Outside magazine, some super-fit athletes do have varieties of bacteria not found in non-athletes. However, since they tend to follow extremely healthy, low-fat diets, is it their diets or their incredible athletic feats that change the bacteria? (Or, do the bacteria contribute to their athletic success?)

Much more research has to be carried out to show that intestinal bacteria are having a direct effect on hunger, athletic performance, or obesity before we can start manipulating our bacterial colonies to bring about certain desirable health effects.  To be sure, there are some studies now gaining interest, that have tested the effects of fecal transplants in which bacteria from healthy volunteers may be transplanted to the intestines of those suffering from an intestinal disease like irritable bowel syndrome. These studies are showing promise in helping people whose intestinal disorders do not respond to conventional therapies.

In the meantime, while we are waiting for more science to support some of the claims that our gut bacteria can alter our heath for better or for worse, we are told to load our intestinal tract with good bacteria. Supposedly, these good bacteria can be eaten if we consume fermented foods such as sauerkraut (fermented cabbage), miso and tempeh (fermented soybeans), kimchi (a Korean dish of fermented cabbage with hot spices), kombucha tea (a fermented drink made with tea, sugar, bacteria, and yeast). and kefir (a fermented yogurt drink). These foods contain probioticsor living bacteria, that when ingested populate our intestinal tract with good microbes. Pasteurization will kill the microbes, both good and bad, which is why many yogurts and canned sauerkraut are not on the list.

But there is a problem. Although scientists can identify many of the species of good intestinal bacteria, they are not listed on a package of tempeh or a bottle of kombucha. Moreover, how many bacteria are we actually eating? Probiotics may differ in their content of something called CFUs, or colony-forming units. CFUs describe the density of viable bacteria in a product. According to Dr. Shekhar K. Challa, a gastroenterologist who wrote Probiotics For Dummies, quantitating the CFUs of probiotics in most food products is almost impossible. CFUs are not listed under calories or any other place on the food label.

So will eating unpasteurized sauerkraut make enough good bacteria to make you thin (that is, if good bacteria will make you thin)? Probably not. But sauerkraut contains almost no calories, and chopping a cabbage, mixing it with salt and watching it turn into sauerkraut is something to do on a snowy afternoon. And after you eat it, its bacteria will have a happy home in you.

References

(“Effects of a high fat diet on intestinal microbiota and gastrointestinal diseases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 2016, Oct 28; 22(40): 8905–8909) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083795/

Don’t Avoid Exercise Because It Makes You Hungry

Among the many kinds of advice given to those who are trying to lose weight, exercise usually ranks just below diet. But just as weight-loss advice can be contradictory and confusing, so too are the recommendations for exercise. No one disputes the benefits of physical activity on everything from improved digestion to better cognition. The adverse effects of ignoring the prescription to move ones body are just as compelling: no exercise equates to bad sleep, bad bones, and bad mood, among other unpleasant symptoms.

But many dieters and weight maintainers are reluctant to exercise because they fear the effect on their hunger. Exercise seems like an ineffective, and indeed unworkable, way of losing weight when post-exercise appetite may lead to eating many more calories than those worked off. Anecdotal reports by dieters of feeling ravenous after a stint on the treadmill or weekly Zumba class supports the erroneous belief that exercise while dieting should be avoided to prevent overeating.

Curiously, highly-trained athletes (who, of course, don’t have to worry about their weight) are the least likely to want to eat after their highly intense exercise routines are completed. In a study published a few years ago on appetite among female athletes, the scientists found that intense exercise actually decreased subjective hunger. Moreover, ghrelin, the hormone in the gut and blood that regulates hunger, was decreased and another hormone that shuts off appetite, increased. (“No Effect of Exercise Intensity on Appetite in Highly-Trained Endurance Women,” Howe, S., Hand, T., Larson-Meyer, D., Austin, K. et al Nutrients, 2016; 8 ) The same effect had been found earlier in studies carried out with male endurance athletes.

Since most of us are not likely to devote a good portion of our lives to training for competitive athletic events, we cannot rely on this for suppressing appetite after exercise. However, it seems that even unfit obese men may also experience a decrease in hunger after intense exercise, at least for 30 minutes after the exercise session completed. Whether they overate several hours later was not reported. (“The Effects of Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Exercise on Hunger Feelings and PYY in Obese Men,” Asrami, A., Faraji, H., Jalali, S., International Journal of Sport Studies, 2014 4; 729-)

But one may ask: what is wrong with being hungry after physical activity? Isn’t hunger a natural and inevitable response of the body after calories are used up? A Food Network show featuring life on a ranch in some unnamed cattle-raising part of the country often features recipes for the “hungry” family and ranch hands after a day of especially hard work. It would be absurd for the workers to avoid physical labor just because they are very hungry when they return home to eat a substantial meal.

But most of us have traveled far from the natural progression of physical activity to hunger to eating to a return of energy, and thus being able to work again. The “I am so hungry that I could eat a horse” (or whatever animal comes to mind) statement after hours of manual labor or recreational physical activity seems to many like a prescription for weight gain, rather than the way nature intended us to feel.

But it is not. Hunger is natural. The hormones causing us to want to eat are there to make sure we do so in order to live. If hunger disappears, as is the case for some with late stage Alzheimer’s disease, the individual will not survive unless others make sure to feed the patient.
In short, we should stop being afraid of being hungry. Hunger means our bodies need food the way being thirsty means our bodies need water. How we satisfy our hunger is what we have to improve if we want to stop gaining weight and begin to lose it. Just as we could, but should not, satisfy our thirst by drinking gallons of champagne or sugary sodas; we should satisfy our hunger not by consuming junk food, but by eating foods that not only supply calories (to replace those used up in exercise) but also needed nutrients into our bodies.

Dieters are told to try to eat fewer calories than needed so the calories in their stored fat will be mobilized to make up the difference. But unless the dieter goes on a drastically low-calorie diet, or a diet that eliminates certain categories of foods, it is possible to eat less, satisfy hunger, and still lose weight. We often eat beyond feeling full, that is, beyond the cessation of hunger; this is why we eat dessert. If eating stops when hunger disappears—even if all the food has not—weight can be lost.
Should you eat before or after exercise? It depends on your body. Some cannot exercise after eating and will eat breakfast after, rather than before, working out in the morning. Others find that they don’t have the energy to play tennis or go hiking unless they have eaten. Therefore, they will eat enough to give their muscles fuel for their workout, but not so much that they feel too stuffed to move.

Sometimes during long bouts of exercise, such as a long bike ride or hike, the first sign that the body needs food is not hunger but fatigue. I remember once when I was cross-country skiing all day, I become too exhausted to move my skis up a hill to get back to the lodge. As I stepped outside the track to let a woman behind me pass, she handed me an energy bar. “You need food,” she said. “Eat this.“ She was right. Within a few minutes I felt my fatigue lift, and I was able to continue moving.

We are told to be in touch with our bodies. Exercising, being hungry, and eating healthfully are excellent ways of communicating with ourselves.

 

 

 

Is the US Becoming More Obese Because of Medication?

Despite a blizzard of weight-loss programs, touting novel fat-reducing foods, and innovative exercise devices, the country is getting fatter and fatter. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that nearly 4 in 10 U.S adults, according to their body mass index, can be classified as obese. Obesity is not evenly distributed among the states. The losers; i.e. the thinnest states, are Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and D.C. The gainer is West Virginia where almost 40% of adults are obese.

We have been becoming heavier for so many decades that we forget how thin we were as a country 80 or more years ago. It is only when viewing newsreels of the first half of the 20th century in which most adults look extremely thin that you realize what we now consider thin was considered normal weight back then.

The same old reasons are brought out yearly to explain why we, and indeed the rest of the world, is getting fatter: junk food, sugary drinks, dependence on motorized transport rather than our two feet, humongous restaurant portions, intestinal flora that make our bodies store fat, too much time on electronic devices, and too little time in the gym.

Might our growing obesity be related to the weight gain after smoking withdrawal? Weight gain is common among ex-smokers, and studies as reported by the National Bureau of Economic Research (Sharon Begley, “Gut Check”) suggest that it may be 11-12 pounds on average. But a close examination of who gains the most weight indicates that smokers with the lowest BMI are most likely to gain the most, and 11 or 12 pounds is not enough weight gain to make them obese.

Could medications used to treat mental disorders be another, mostly overlooked cause of national weight gain? That psychotropic drugs—the medications used to treat depression, anxiety, bipolar disorderschizophrenia and other mental diseases—cause weight gain is established. Sometimes the weight gain is only a few pounds, stops after a month or two, and is lost as soon as the treatment ends. But many drugs cause substantial weight gain because the patient experiences a relentless urge to eat. Moreover, to the chagrin, indeed horror of some patients, stopping the medications does not always cause weight loss even with dieting and exercise.

Data on the use of psychotropic drugs comes from a 2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey discussed in a Scientific American article by Sara Miller.  One in six Americans is taking a psychotropic drug, although not all are being prescribed for mental illness. There have also been many studies showing that depression itself is linked to future obesity. A common depression, Seasonal Affective Disorder, is diagnosed in part by the overeating and weight gain of patients during the increased darkness of winter. Often the depression of PMS and pre-menopause is accompanied by overeating and weight gain as well.

Yet in the list of causes for our increasing girth, reasons such as genes, inflammation, bad gut bacteria and bread are more likely to be found than the weight-gaining potential of depression and the drugs that treat it.

Where are the weight-loss programs specifically designed to help those whose overeating is caused by lack of sunlight, or hormones affecting appetite control centers in the brain, or drugs that hijack control over satiety? Where are the support services for those who are embarrassed to go to the gym because their medications have turned their formerly fit and slim body into a much heavier one?  Recently someone who has been struggling to lose the weight gained on her medication for obsessive-compulsive disorder told me that her dietician put her on a low- carbohydrate diet. “I was craving carbohydrates all the time,” she told me, “so the dietician figured the easiest way to take care of that problem was to remove them from my diet. She did not realize that my medication had caused the cravings even though I told her. And since I couldn’t stop my drugs, I just craved bread and pasta so much on her diet that I began to binge.”

 

This story is typical in that this patient was not seen as needing specialized weight-loss help because her weight gain was the result of a drug, and not related to emotional issuesor an inability to make healthy food choices. Moreover, the dietician’s advice to remove carbohydrates showed lack of knowledge on the effect of eating carbohydrates on serotonin synthesis. Serotonin levels drop when carbohydrates are not consumed and often lead to a worsening of the obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, or other mental disorders.

How long is it going to be before weight-loss professionals acknowledge that many of the obese in the United States are that way because of their medications? How long will it be before thought, labor, and money are put into programs to address their special needs?

Will 2018 bring about needed innovations in weight-loss therapy for these individuals, or will we just become fatter?

Losing Weight in a Weight-Loss Resort: Will It Stay Off?

The New York Times recently reported on the change of ownership of one of the better-known weight loss/fitness resorts, Canyon Ranch. The article described the resort’s comprehensive program for those who want to lose weight and improve their fitness. Like many other facilities frequented by those who can afford both the very high price and the time off from work, Canyon Ranch offers more than well-prepared low-calorie food and exercise opportunities that include hikes, exercise classes, a fitness center, and individual training. Massages, lectures on stress-reduction/mindfulness, consultations with nutritionists and physicians, and even wrinkle-reducing treatments prepare the guests for entry into the real world in a much-improved physical and mental state. Sometimes people will stay at facilities like Canyon Ranch or others such as Hilton Head for weeks if they have a considerable amount of weight to lose. Some places stress hours of strenuous exercise and all restrict portion size and variety of food. No alcohol, of course, is allowed.

It is hard to obtain information on whether, after returning home, participants are able to maintain their lower weight, increased fitness, and decreased stress. The article mentioned that at least half of the people who go to Canyon Ranch have gone there before; one woman had visited the facility more than 100 times. No information was provided as to whether she needed to return frequently to maintain her weight and fitness status, or because she simply loved the facility or both.

The transition from staying in a facility detached from the realities of daily life (some forbid the use of electronic devices, television, and newspapers) to the real world may jolt the individual out of his or her newly found healthy lifestyle and make the return to old eating and exercise habits unavoidable. The weight-loss resorts don’t have satellite ‘drop-in centers‘ to reinforce what was learned and practiced while participating in the residential program. Few can maintain the four or five hours of daily exercise in which they engaged while at the resort; at least, not without giving up their day job. Reproducing the low-calorie meals with their emphasis on vegetables, grains, and lentils takes more effort than ordering takeout. And eating away from home at work, meetings, social occasions, and while traveling limit further the ability to obtain the foods offered at the weight-loss facility.

In short, taking on and keeping new habits requires time and effort. Plunging immediately back into the life led before going to these weight-loss resorts may shatter the new lifestyle acquired there.

People whose weight-loss efforts begin at home with dieting, and perhaps some exercise, are familiar from the very beginning of their diet with the struggles they must overcome to lose weight. They are dealing with all the stress triggers- temptations to overeat, work, family matters, exhaustion and lack of time, that may have contributed to their gaining weight.

Those who opt for stomach reduction surgery face an additional struggle because they cannot overeat without making themselves sick, and yet may also face all the factors that caused their weight gain. In contrast, people whose path to better weight and fitness starts in the otherworldly atmosphere of a residential weight loss and fitness facility are helped enormously by the elimination of triggers to overeating.

That is, until they leave.

However, there could be an enduring positive effect to losing weight and becoming more fit as a result of participating in a residential weight-loss facility. Success at seeing oneself thinner, even if it is only by a couple of pounds, and gaining stamina and strength, could motivate and reinforce further weight loss and fitness efforts. Many people don’t start diets or refuse to do any physical activity because they assume they will fail, at one or the other, or both. Stories of people self-identified as unfit, who go to one of the more physically demanding weight-loss programs and find themselves able to hike four or five hours a day, and then participate in hours more of physical training, are often shocked at their ability to do so. People who at home have not been able to give up their high-calorie foods and instead resist eating “healthful” foods, learn to enjoy varieties of grains and vegetables at these facilities and may try to continue eating these foods when they return home.

Could they have initiated these activities and changes in food choices without going to a weight-loss resort? Of course. But at home, they have a choice not to. At the resort, they either do or do not eat what they are served and participate in often grueling physical activity programs, or drop out of the program.

Most adults will never have the opportunity to go to a resort where food, physical activity, stress, sleep, and pampering are designed to make them feel optimally healthy. But might it be possible to take some of the effective programs at these facilities, such as healthful menu selections, opportunities for recreational exercise, e.g., hiking, stress reduction techniques, and introduce them into the workplace for everyone?

These methods of weight loss and fitness seem to be reserved for the few who can afford them. But like many things in our society, from indoor plumbing to cell phones, eventually they become available for most. Perhaps someday, strategies to eat healthful foods, maintain a normal weight, and achieve fitness will be available without staying in a weight-loss resort.

Will Watering Your Stomach Increase or Decrease Food Intake?

His water glass at dinner needed constant refilling, and I was worried that he had some sort of metabolic condition. But that was not the case. My relative by marriage said he always gulped water with every bite because it decreased his need to chew his food. “I swallow faster so I can eat faster,” he told me. Growing up in a family where there was competition for seconds, he learned that if he was the first to clean his plate, he got the remainder of the food on the table. The habit never left him.

Using water to lubricate swallowing is also behind the success of competitive eaters. Such people’s ability to consume enormous amounts of food in short periods of time made overeating into a sport. They train their stomachs to accept 30 hot dogs or chicken wings in the amount of time it takes to unfold a napkin. An interview with Yasir Salem, a competitive overeater ranked #10 in world competition by Erin McCarthy on the Internet site, “Mental Floss,” revealed his use of water in his training. He stretches his stomach by drinking daily a gallon of water after eating several pounds of a bulky vegetable, e.g., broccoli. And during a competition, he dunks hot dog rolls into warm water to soften them, so they can be swallowed quickly and with little chewing.

Competitive overeaters, as well as members of a family competing for the last chicken leg, are not the only ones who use water to eat quickly. Binge eaters will also drink water or other liquids to make it easy to consume large amounts of food in a small period of time. Indeed, many of us probably drink water or soda with our food when we find ourselves needing to finish eating in a hurry.

Drinking water with food to increase the amount of food eaten contradicts general wisdom about the use of water during a meal to decrease food intake. The use of water to fill up the stomach before the meal begins has been recommended for decades. ”Drink one or two large glasses of water before you sit down to eat,” say most weight-loss advisers, “and you will find that you can’t put much food in your stomach.” This is contradicted by Mr. Salem, who told his interviewer that he drinks a gallon of water before starting the eating competition, to effectively flush out his digestive system and make it ready for large quantities of food.

Similarly, drinking water with every bite of food, or at least after two or three bites, is strongly recommended as a way of slowing food intake. If, as the theory goes, you have to put down your fork or spoon, pick up your water glass, take a sip or two, put down the water glass, pick up the eating utensil and start eating again, the rate of food intake will slow considerably. Unlike my relative or Mr. Salem, the food is presumably chewed and swallowed before the water is imbibed. The water is not a lubricant to make swallowing faster and easier, but instead as a “time-out” from putting more food in the mouth.

Drinking more water also completes the end of the meal. If the plate is cleaned, but the eater does not feel full, diet coaches recommend drinking one or two large glasses of water at the end of the meal to convey the sensation of fullness. Carbonated water may work even better because if enough bubbles are swallowed, the stomach feels bloated and incapable of receiving more food. Carbonated drinks such as beer or sugar-filled sodas are not recommended because they deliver excess calories.

Obviously water can increase or decrease food intake depending on how it is incorporated into the eating process. And since most people attempting to lose weight are not going to be competing for seconds or entering an eating competition, drinking water before, during, or after the meal will, hopefully, decrease food intake. The water intake between bites is supposed to slow eating sufficiently so the brain will signal to the eater to stop before the stomach is totally filled up with more food than necessary.

But curiously, this seemingly innocuous recommendation has met with some resistance by those who claim that drinking water with a meal decreases the ability of the stomach to digest food. Water will dilute the enzymes in the saliva that start the process of digestion, and then further dilute the stomach enzymes that work to break the food down more before sending it to the small intestine; so claim the anti-water folk. Although debunked thoroughly by scientists, the recommendation to avoid water during a meal continues to circulate.

One of the problems with relying on water to confer satisfaction and fullness after consuming less food than desired is that water doesn’t stay in the stomach very long. It passes through much more quickly than food and, once gone, may leave a sense that now there is room for more food. If the eater wants to eat less without using will power to do so, then the most natural, drug-free way is to increase the serotonin levels in the brain. This is accomplished by eating a pre-meal snack of about 20 grams of a starchy carbohydrate such as a small roll. Twenty minutes later, the brain will make new serotonin and this neurotransmitter will convey a sense of fullness or satiety to the roll eater.

Starting the meal with the feeling of not being very hungry is helpful to slow your eating. If you are feeling somewhat full, you are more likely to eat slowly and eat less—and leave the seconds to someone else

 

Does Halloween Begin the Trifecta of Weight Gain?

Soon after Labor Day, almost before the bathing suits of summer have been put away, bags of miniature Halloween candy begIn to appear on supermarket and drugstore shelves. Those tiny candy bars will be devoured to celebrate a holiday that has nothing to do with candy, and the hundreds of calories they contain will initiate the fall season of weight gain. Soon the black and orange wrapped candy will be replaced by chocolate turkeys for the national binge day, Thanksgiving, and then towers of green and red wrapped candies, cookies, and cakes will be displayed for the December holidays.

It is understandable how Thanksgiving and Christmas became holidays characterized, in part, by excessive consumption of special foods that are usually replete with cream, butter, sugar, egg yolks and chocolate. In the old days, these holidays represented the few times a year when expensive, scarce food stuffs like sugar, chocolate, costly cuts of meat, and exotic fruits like oranges, and special alcoholic drinks were served in liberal portions.  Religious and national events like Christmas, the 4th of July, or the yearly fair have always been celebrated with copious amounts of food.  Often guests contributed their own special recipes to a gathering, and it was not unusual to have several main dishes, many sides and a large number of desserts. No one worried about how many calories were eaten because food intake was frugal and, for some, even scarce for the rest of the year.  But now, of course, the caloric excesses that begin with devouring miniature candy bars and end with New Year’s Eve buffets may not be compensated with frugal eating the rest of the time.

But how is that Halloween, a holiday which originated as a religious event, has metamorphosed into the opportunity to eat excessive amount of sugars, fat, artificial flavorings and color while wearing a costume? And how is it that the attempt by some food companies to reduce sugar content in many of their products is being offset by large confectionery companies marketing Halloween candy? And how, as our nation becomes fatter every year, are we going to continue to allow this?

Collecting, counting, and collating the candy gathered during an evening of trick or treating is a relatively new phenomenon. To be sure, hordes of face-painted or masked kids have been roaming the streets on Halloween, ringing doorbells and asking for handouts for many decades. Mid-20th century, the handouts were rarely commercially packaged miniaturized candy bars. Treats like cookies, popcorn balls, Rice Krispy squares, brownies and fudge were often homemade. Candy corn, invented in l880, Hersey’s Kisses in l907 and M+M’s in l941, along with a smattering of regular size candy bars, were available as treats, but competed with homemade chocolate chip cookies. Then we became scared of anything that was not made and sealed in a factory. The appearance of razor blades in apples and the possibility of toxic ingredients in homemade baked goods frightened us into allowing our children and ourselves to accept only commercially produced, sealed snacks like miniature candy bars and tiny bags of candy corn. And the confectionery companies responded. Any candy that could be shrunk, wrapped in Halloween colors, put in a large bag and sold in bulk, was.

Of course, the calories per candy item were also shrunk because the candies were one big bite.  Alas (and the candy makers know this), we think, “They are so small, how could they be fattening?” and pop three or four tiny Snickers or Butterfinger bars into our mouths.  The little candies can be stashed in drawers, brief cases, knapsacks, glove compartments, pocketbooks and pockets and constitute an almost endless supply of sugary, high-fat treats—and calories. And so the season of fattening ourselves up begins.

The over-consumption of sugary treats falls at the time of year when we may be feeling stressed because of after-summer vacation workload for adults and for kids, homework.  Are we craving candy because as darkness increases, our good moods decrease? Would chewing through a mound of candy corn be as appealing in the middle of July as it is at the end of October?  We know that the good mood brain chemical, serotonin, is made when any carbohydrate (sugar, starch) other than fruit is eaten. Is candy more appealing than a bowl of oatmeal that brings about the same feelings of calm and comfort?

It is hard to find any good reason for children or adults to consume mounds of candy. In an ideal world, the plastic bags of miniature candy bars would be replaced by bags of vacuum-packed apple slices, or oranges or baby carrots. Treats might also include pretzels, popcorn, miniature protein or high fiber, high-energy bars or breakfast bars. These have the virtue of being low or fat-free, have some nutritional value, and, after the holiday, can be put in a lunch box for a daily snack.

But how are we going to stop the avalanche of fall candy consumption? It means pushing back against the confectionery companies so that like the large soda manufacturers who have reduced sugar in their drinks, they see a profit in offering healthier Halloween treats. It means working within neighborhoods and schools to convince everyone to resist dumping handfuls of candy bars into plastic pumpkins held by seven year-old trick-or-treaters. Perhaps people can be convinced to donate some of the money that would have been spent on candy to a local food bank and contribute the rest to the local school or neighborhood center for a Halloween party.  Halloween is a holiday made for fun, and surely we can figure out how to have fun without the candy calories hanging on our hips the next day.

Can You Lose Weight If You Don’t Know How to Diet?

Our formerly thin, physically active friend had gained close to 80 pounds following two years of debilitating orthopedic problems that left him with chronic back pain. His previous constant exercise, which included tennis, skiing, long bike rides, hiking, and running had kept his weight normal, but became no longer possible. Now he was able to move only with the help of a back brace and two hiking sticks that he used as canes.

“I am trying to lose weight,” he told us, “but it is slow going.”

When we were guests at his home, it was obvious how physically impaired he was as well as how hard it was going to be for him to attain a weight that would help relieve his back pain. The one day he walked on his long hilly driveway to point out a particularly beautiful landscape, he paid for it in increased pain the next morning. Simply moving from living room to dining room was difficult for him. He talked about how he never needed to diet before he developed a back problem because his level of physical activity kept his appetite down and burned off excess calories. A review of the relationship between physical activity and weight change confirms his experience. (“The Role of Exercise and Physical Activity in Weight Loss and Maintenance,” Swift, D., Johannsen, N., Lavie, C., Earnest, C., Church, T Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014, Jan-Feb; 56 (4): 441-447.)

Routine physical activity like the type my friend used to do slows, or even prevents weight gain, without any change in calorie intake. And the long duration of many of his physical activities may even have dampened his appetite according to a very recent study published in the Journal of Endocrinology. (“Acute effect of exercise intensity and duration on acylated ghrelin and hunger in men,” Broom, D., Miyashita, M., Wasse, L., Pulsford, R., King, J., Thackray, A., Stensel, D., J Endocrinol. 2017; 232 (3): 411-422.)  Now, however, the beneficial effect of exercise, when added to a reduced calorie diet on hastening weight loss is out of reach for him.

Told by his physician that a substantial weight loss might lessen his back pain has motivated him to decrease his calorie consumption. His strategy, as he told us, is to consume less than he had been eating.  But he has lost very little weight over the past few months of attempting to do just this.  His lack of success may be due to his inexperience in dieting. He doesn’t know how much he is eating, nor does he know whether what he is eating is particularly high or low in calories (he does know the difference, however, between salads and cake.)  Another family member, who has never had a weight problem and likes to cook dishes containing high calorie ingredients, prepares his food. Butter, heavy cream, and cheese are routinely added and her sweet tooth motivates her to bake or buy cakes, cookies, pies and other desserts that are offered to our friend.  Eating in restaurants for dinner (and occasionally both lunch and dinner) occurs frequently, and this adds to the uncertainty of how many calories are being consumed. Overly large restaurant portion sizes, and the habit of chefs to add butter or oil to food to keep them moist, also inadvertently boosts his calorie intake. And, unlike experienced dieters, he has not developed an eye for judging portion sizes and not eating the entire amount if it is too big.

None of this would matter if losing weight were for cosmetic rather than medical reasons. However, when weight loss is crucial to improving health, and, in his case, restoring lost freedom of movement and removing his pain? Dieting must be done with the same care and knowledge as any other intervention to improve health. The approach cannot be casual or haphazard, and would probably benefit from the professional services of a dietician or nutritionist. The type of diet must also be sustainable and balanced nutritionally for the many weeks it takes to lose the necessary weight. Many alleged quick weight-loss diets, so tempting because results after only a few weeks are supposedly so dramatic, often lead to weight gain as soon as the diet is over. (Remember the Oprah Winfrey’s famous fast weight-loss from a low calorie liquid diet, and the subsequent rapid regain several years ago?) Regaining weight is not an option when it may bring about a return of the medical problem like intolerable back pain. Thus the diet plan has to be malleable enough to change into a long-time maintenance program to keep the now lower weight stable.

Being honest with family and friends about how hard it is to lose weight and consequently asking for help will improve the chance of success. Imagine how much more weight our friend would have lost if his meals had been significantly lower in calories and size. Preparing meals at home that that could be made without the addition of fat-dense ingredients such as cheese would help reduce the calories he was eating. If others wanted to add more cheese to their dishes, for example, they could do so after the food was prepared.  His problem in reducing calorie intake in restaurants could be solved by either eating in establishments that served normal-size portions, or ordering appetizers for a main dish or splitting an entrée. The temptation to eat dessert would disappear if it were not on the table in front him.

Dieting is like any new activity. As it is with playing the piano, speaking a foreign language, or planting a successful garden, it has to be learned. Instruction is needed, along with patience, the willingness to practice and make mistakes, and encouragement from others. And like taking on any new activity, even small successes are worthy and worth striving for.

With Whom You Eat May Affect How Much You Weigh

Two weeks ago we were dinner guests at an expensive steak restaurant. Our hosts, who were celebrating their anniversary, urged their guests to order the restaurant’s specialty steak: twenty-four ounces of aged beef.  Everyone, except for another guest and I, complied (we both ordered fish.) Many side dishes were ordered by the hosts to be passed around family style: a dish of fried potatoes oozing butter, asparagus coated with a creamy sauce, and broccoli covered with melted cheese. Despite protests of feeling stuffed, we were told to indulge in dessert: soup bowls of creampuffs filled with ice cream and drenched in hot fudge sauce.

As we waddled home I remarked that it was a good thing we didn’t eat like this more than once a year, if that. Working off all those calories would take hours at the gym, and a frugal meal plan for a few days.  My husband agreed. “I really didn’t want to order such a large piece of meat but since our hosts were so insistent, and everyone else was ordering it, I felt that I should, too. And I wasn’t hungry for dessert, but it was hard to refuse. “

Last week we experienced an opposite social pressure on how we should eat.  Invited to a buffet dinner following a lecture at a local museum, we were offered poached salmon, baked chicken, marble-size boiled potatoes, salad and rolls. No butter was served. The plates tiny, somewhat smaller than salad plates, and once a lettuce leaf, tomato slice, and a minute piece of fish or chicken was placed on it, there was barely room for one potato.  No dessert was available or, if it was, it was hidden in a remote part of the dining area. As one of the guests with whom we sat remarked, “I guess I don’t have to worry about eating too much at this meal!“

These two eating experiences confirm anecdotally what many studies have shown. Social eating can influence the amount and type of food we consume.

Indeed, web sites focused on helping dieters stay motivated suggest choosing eating companions who reinforce healthy, calorie-conscious food choices.  Eating with friends at a restaurant that offers low-fat, non-fried foods, including a variety of whole-grain and vegetable options, makes it so much easier to stay on a diet than eating at a place where the food is batter-coated, or sauced with cheese.  Conversely, going with others to a massive brunch buffet, or a clam shack known for its tower of fried clams, coleslaw drowning in mayonnaise, and unlimited French fries makes it extremely hard for the dieter to say no to these temptations or, in some cases, such as the clam shack, even find something diet-worthy to order.

However, it is not necessary to become an “eating hermit” in order to lose weight. Many restaurants post their menus on their web sites so it is possible for the weight or health conscious to see ahead of time whether there are calorically appropriate meal options. Admittedly, it is difficult to tell friends or co-workers that you prefer not eating at a particular place because you won’t find anything to eat (like at a fried clam shack) that is appropriate for your diet. But these days it may be easier to do so as now that so many have specific food restrictions.  Friends or family, one hopes, would not invite a Moslem or kosher Jewish guest to a barbecue place featuring pork, or suggest going out for pizza with someone who has gluten sensitivity. Since it would be fitting to suggest an alternative restaurant for someone who can’t eat gluten or pork, it is appropriate to identify a restaurant with choices compatible with the caloric needs of someone on a diet or trying not to gain weight.

A little discussed but annoying problem of social eating is the nosy invasiveness of eating companions who feel they have the right to make remarks about the type and amount of food you are eating. Too often comments will be made about portion size: “Is that all you are eating?” or lack of fattening ingredients: “That salad looks inedible without any salad dressing!” or a rejection of dessert: “You never eat it, do you?”  People who would never urge someone in alcohol recovery to “just have one drink” will cajole a fellow dinner who is attempting not to gain weight to “C’mon! Enjoy some of that chocolate cake; it won’t kill you!” It is rarely possible to respond by pointing out the rudeness of the remarks or offering unflattering comments about the speaker’s size or eating habits. Avoidance and seeking out like-minded eaters is probably the only solution.

And that may not be so easy anymore, because the world is getting fatter. A recent report found that 10% of the world’s population is now obese. One consequence is a global eating environment where dishes containing excessively fattening ingredients or mega-sized portions are becoming normative. The gigantic, but apparently typical portions of steak we encountered at the anniversary party are likely to become more common than the meager portions of the museum dinner.  If we succumb to accepting that we are expected to eat portion sizes inappropriate for healthy calorie intake, then we risk increasing our own size a few pounds every year until we are overweight, or even obese. And even worse, if everyone around us is larger than they should be and consuming portions much larger than they should be eating, who will notice?

Obviously, it is rarely possible to restrict the people with whom you eat to those who will reinforce your weight and heath goals. But it is important to resist the pressure of fellow diners to eat promiscuously, to choose food without heed for calories or saturated fat or sugar that have negative effects on health. It is important to realize that after the meal is over, only you will be standing on the scale.