Monthly Archives: September 2018

Medication-Linked Weight Gain & Clothing Discrimination

Until someone joins the ranks of the size 16 and over, she probably has no idea of the discrimination from the fashion industry and department stores that awaits her when she needs to buy clothes. For you who were wearing “chubby“ sizes as children, and forced into wearing clothes designed for a woman when you were still an adolescent girl, shopping as an overweight or obese adult is an indignity and discomfort that you know all too well.

However, if you are someone whose size has migrated upward as a result of weight gain from antidepressants, mood stabilizers, low dose steroids, or other medications, you will probably be shocked at what awaits you on the racks of the larger size clothes in department stores. And if you loved fashion, or at least wanted to wear something other than oversized tops and stretch bottoms, you will be dismayed at the paucity of designers and designs for someone who does not fit into what the industry calls “normal“ size.

Once, while talking with a weight-loss client whose obesity was a result of her antidepressant treatment, I asked her how she shopped for clothes. She had been a competitive athlete during her young adulthood, and her body could have been on the cover of Shape or Self magazine. Now she was struggling to lose the fifty or so pounds she had gained on her medication.

“I don’t shop unless I absolutely have to, and then I go to stores like Old Navy where the sizes are more generous. A size large in a store like Banana Republic or Madewell would be a medium in a store like Old Navy, so I didn’t feel so bad about my body when I shopped there. And there were enough shoppers who wear large sizes to support a pretty good selection. It isn’t like going to a regular department store and being sent to a plus-size department behind housewares or pet supplies, and where there were relatively few styles and none I would consider wearable,” she told me. She went on to say that, like many women (and some men), she had found clothes shopping to be a pleasurable distraction from training and her college studies. “It was fun going to the mall with my friends and trying on clothes. But after I gained weight, the selection was so limited, and in many cases so ghastly, I hated to shop. It is as if fashion stopped with size 12.”

She was right.

A few weeks ago my persistent channel surfing on the TV attached to the treadmill at my gym brought up an old episode of “Project Runway.” What made this episode different was that the models were the mothers and sisters of the fashion designer contestants. Thus, they were told to design clothes for models whose bodies looked much different than the industry’s norm. Indeed, several of the moms were in the larger than “normal” size category, a fact that made the designers not very happy. Several seemed incapable of making clothes that were not burka-like; others covered most of the upper body with a voluminous poncho or jackets. The objective, it seemed, was to pretend that the women did not have body parts with bumps and curves.

Tim Gunn, who had been the taskmaster of this show, now many seasons old, confirmed my impression in an article published in the Washington Post in September 2016. He said that even though the average American woman is a size 16 or 18, and is willing to outspend her thinner sisters on clothes, “many designers—dripping with disdain, lacking imagination or simply too cowardly to take a risk—still refuse to make clothes for them.”

This past June, Steve Dennis, writing for Forbes, confirmed what Gunn stated. Dennis described much of the fashion industry as being biased against any image of women that did not conform to an unrealistically thin body. Yet according to Plunkett Research, a market research firm, 68 percent of American women today wear size 14 or above.

Women’s sizes may be getting larger, but the amount of space in a department store selling clothes to fit their bodies is not expanding. And the clothes are certainly not front and center when the shopper exits the escalator onto the floor featuring women’s clothes. The “cute stuff,” size 2, is on the mannequins; the plus-size department is a hike away.

The answer proposed to the frustrated larger shopper is to shop online. Of course, buying clothes, along with everything we need or want online, is done by almost everyone regardless of size. Indeed, some manufacturers of plus-size clothes that only sell online promote the advantages of trying clothes on in the privacy of one’s home, and will accept returns of clothes that do not fit.

But according to an insightful article by Sara Tatyana Bernstein, not being able to try clothes on at a store is frustrating. Not everyone who is size 14 or 18 or 22 has the same shape, and not everyone carries the excess weight in the same areas of the body, she tells us. And the woman who has had a slimmer body prior to gaining weight on antidepressants might need the help of an experienced saleswoman to figure out what looks best on her new larger shape. However, Bernstein did report her own positive experience going into a couple of stores (Torrid and Lane Bryant) where, in her words, “the larger shopper feels comfortable and supported by other shoppers of the same size.”

She also has an interesting observation about the lack of quality in many clothes made for the larger woman. Even though market surveys show that often the larger woman is willing to spend more on clothes than her smaller counterpart, according to Bernstein, clothes of good quality, made to last, are very hard to find. She suggests that manufacturers make cheap (in regards to the items’ durability) plus-size clothes in the belief that no woman wants to remain a large size. Thus she doesn’t want to invest money in clothes worn only temporarily—i.e. until she loses weight. Why, the thinking goes, would a woman want to buy expensive “staples” that sooner or later will be too big to wear?

Since many who have gained weight on medication now find it impossible to lose weight months, and even years, after the drugs are discontinued, they don’t know whether they will ever lose that weight. And there are many others who for a variety of reasons may not be able to reduce to a “normal” size without great difficulty. Isn’t it time to manufacture larger-size clothes that flatter and endure? If Peter Paul Rubens could make the larger woman look desirable, cannot today’s fashion designers do the same?

References

“A Plus In The Sun: The Spatial Politics Of Selling Plus-Size Clothes To Women,” Body Politics, Fashion July 31, 2017.

Should a Personal Trainer Be Present at a Wellness Exam?

Several years ago, wellness examinations were introduced into medical practices as a way of detecting possible health risks, especially among an older population. It made and makes sense. Detecting high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol or blood glucose, and too low levels of essential nutrients meant that interventions could be started to prevent a worsening of the individual’s health and quality of life. But do these assessments really measure the wellness of the individual?

Consider falling. Falling is a common risk factor for older people, and now that the Baby Boomer population is in that category of older Americans the incidence of falling will predictably increase. The loss of bone and muscle mass and balance that accompany aging certainly increase the risk of tripping over obstacles that might not even register a slight stumble in a younger individual. And unfortunately 30 to 40 percent of people 65 and older may trip and fall. The effect of a fall is not a tumble and, “Don’t worry, I am not hurt.” About half of these falls cause injury that becomes more serious the older the individual.

Thus the wellness assessment should include detection of physical deficits that might make the patient vulnerable to falling. If a decline in balance or uneven gait is detected before injury from falling occurs, a “prescription” for therapeutic exercises can be offered so these conditions can be helped. This would be similar to a physician making sure a patient received nutritional advice if blood tests showed pre-diabetes or early signs of iron deficiency. But according to guidelines from American and British Geriatric societies, no assessment of risk from falling will be made unless the patient has already fallen or complains of feeling unsteady while walking. If one is lucky or unlucky enough to have fallen (excuse the pun) into this category, then he or she is sent to someone for evaluation of walking and balance.

But why wait until there is a problem? If a patient was pre-diabetic based on fasting blood sugar levels, should a doctor wait until the symptoms of diabetes appears before starting treatment?

Your physician does not have to be a physical therapist or certified personal trainer to assess whether you have poor balance or impaired walking and need help to improve these functions.

The test to measure balance is simple. For example:

  • Can you stand on one leg and bend the other 45 degrees or place it against the calf of the standing leg? Can you do this on each leg for 30 seconds?
  • Can you walk ten steps with the heel of your front foot touching the toe of your back foot? (This is harder than it seems…)
  • Step to the right with your weight on your right foot. Bring your left foot next to your right foot. Then do the same with the opposite feet. Slowly.

There are other similar balance tests that are also used as exercises to improve balance.

The results of a balance test can be surprising. A friend who had an ankle operation found that even though her ankle had healed and the muscle mass of her leg restored, she had much more trouble balancing on the operated leg than the other years after the operation. Another who had stopped going to yoga classes because of scheduling conflicts and who could stand on one foot seemingly forever was horrified to find that after a couple of years not doing balance exercises she had trouble standing on one foot for less than a minute.

Gait is a fancy term for moving your feet while walking. Gait speed is a measure of how quickly someone can walk from a specific point to another specific point. Measurements of gait needs a bit more space than a balance test, and if problems are detected, a thorough evaluation, including walking on a treadmill and the walking videoed for later analysis by a physical therapist. In the initial test, a distance is measured out and the individual asked to walk at a normal gait /speed to the end point. This is timed and often repeated to get an accurate result. Gait speed is then calculated by dividing the distance by the time it takes to cover it.

So, if you walked 12 meters (one meter equals three feet) in 12 seconds, than you would walk one meter (or three feet) per second. Although gait certainly can slow down simply with aging—a 90 year-old probably walks more slowly than a 50 year-old—other factors such as being unable to pick up one’s feet (shuffling), perceptual problems, poor balance and muscle weakness can slow down the pace of walking in an otherwise healthy person.

These measurements of balance and gait do not require the services of a personal trainer or physical therapist. They can even be made at home. They don’t take time. Indeed, they probably require less time than one typically spends in the waiting room when the doctor is behind in his or her appointments.  But they should be made under medical supervision because they can reveal problems that are more medically complex than aging or lack of exercise.  Loss of balance and abnormally slow gait can be due to inflammation or other inner ear problems, nerve damage to the legs, vision problems, muscle weakness, side effects of some medications and neurological diseases like Parkinson’s. The underlying causes must be addressed.

Balance is something we don’t notice we have lost until we do. All of us must find out how vulnerable we are before that first fall.

References

“Assessment and Management of Fall Risk in Primary Care Settings,” Phelan, E., Mahoney, J., Voit, P., and Stevens, J., Med Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 99(2): 281–293.

“Gait Speed as a Measure in Geriatric Assessment in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review,” Peel, N., Kuys, S., Klein, K., The Journals of Gerontology: 68; 2013: 39-46.